Lecture quiz
Quiz - What makes a project bankable
Developing Bankable Climate Finance Proposals. Unlimited attempts, no timer, and one pass mark for the whole platform - applied the same way to the 3 written questions below the multiple choice.
Questions
4
70% to pass
Attempts
-
no figures in this prototype
Pass rate
-
no figures yet
Average score
-
no figures yet
Questions
The correct answer and its explanation are shown together here so you can check them at a glance - neither is ever shown to a learner attempting the quiz, right or wrong.
1. What makes a project 'bankable' rather than simply worthwhile?
- It has government backing
- It produces a measurable return or saving a funder can point toCorrect
- It is technically innovative
- It has no environmental impact
A project can be entirely worth doing and still not be bankable if nothing about it produces a measurable return a funder can point to.
Edit question
Question 1. Four options, one correct.
2. A revenue-generating project pitched only for grant funding is making what mistake?
- Asking for too much money
- Wasting the strongest thing the project hasCorrect
- Underestimating construction costs
- Ignoring the climate rationale
Matching the finance type to a project's actual cash flow is decided before the proposal is drafted - a revenue-generating project belongs with a different source.
Edit question
Question 2. Four options, one correct.
3. What does a strong climate rationale have to do?
- Cite as many co-benefits as possible
- Connect the intervention to a climate outcome by steps someone can checkCorrect
- Avoid mentioning cost
- Focus only on emissions reduced
A rationale that asserts a benefit without a checkable chain of steps does not survive review; each link has to be something a reader can follow and dispute.
Edit question
Question 3. Four options, one correct.
4. In project finance terms, where should risk generally sit?
- With the party that has the deepest balance sheet
- With the party best able to manage itCorrect
- Always with the public sector
- Wherever the funder prefers
Demand risk placed on a contractor who cannot influence demand is priced heavily or refused; retained by the party that can manage it, it often costs far less.
Edit question
Question 4. Four options, one correct.
Add a question
Four options, one correct. The explanation is for staff only, to check the question against - a learner attempting the quiz never sees it.
Written questions
Optional - a lecture is complete without any. Add two-to-three sentence explanation questions where the multiple-choice quiz cannot tell whether an idea actually landed - as soon as one exists, a learner must pass it at 70%, the same platform-wide mark as the quiz, before the next lecture opens.
1. In two or three sentences: what makes a project 'bankable' rather than simply worthwhile?
measurablereturncash flowfund2 of 4 have to appear to pass.
Model answer: A worthwhile project is one that is worth doing on its merits. A bankable one goes further - it produces a measurable return, saving, or cash flow that a funder can point to and underwrite, not just a good outcome.
Edit written question
Question 1. Checked against the words and phrases listed below.
2. In two or three sentences: why does matching the finance type to the project matter before a proposal is drafted?
revenuegrantmatchcash flow2 of 4 have to appear to pass.
Model answer: A revenue-generating project pitched only for grant funding wastes the strongest thing it has - a repayable cash flow that could unlock a loan or blended finance instead. Getting this match wrong before drafting means rewriting the whole proposal later.
Edit written question
Question 2. Checked against the words and phrases listed below.
3. In two or three sentences: what does a strong climate rationale have to do that a list of co-benefits does not?
connectstepcheckoutcome2 of 4 have to appear to pass.
Model answer: A strong rationale connects the intervention to a climate outcome through steps a reader can follow and check, not just a list of claimed co-benefits. A rationale that asserts a benefit without a checkable chain of steps does not survive review.
Edit written question
Question 3. Checked against the words and phrases listed below.
Add a written question
A short explanation, checked for the words a correct answer would use - not multiple choice.